Comments on: The Fundamental Law Of SEO http://www.revolves.net/2009/02/19/the-fundamental-law-of-seo/ Innovation Sun, 08 Aug 2010 20:46:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: annelies http://www.revolves.net/2009/02/19/the-fundamental-law-of-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1306 annelies Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:10:24 +0000 http://www.revolves.net/?p=59#comment-1306 Thanks, It reminds me to pay more attention on content quality rather than hunting for more backlink and the blog layout. Thanks,
It reminds me to pay more attention on content quality rather than hunting for more backlink and the blog layout.

]]> By: listorbit http://www.revolves.net/2009/02/19/the-fundamental-law-of-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-727 listorbit Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:52:16 +0000 http://www.revolves.net/?p=59#comment-727 Three SEO laws, Quality content, Quality back links Quality site architecture. Three SEO laws,
Quality content,
Quality back links
Quality site architecture.

]]> By: admin http://www.revolves.net/2009/02/19/the-fundamental-law-of-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-707 admin Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:06:31 +0000 http://www.revolves.net/?p=59#comment-707 I've just glimpsed through your blog post. Finding it quite interesting. I just need a little more time for a thorough read up. I'll try to get some examples if I can. Surely will help a lot of people. Thanks again for commenting! I’ve just glimpsed through your blog post. Finding it quite interesting. I just need a little more time for a thorough read up.

I’ll try to get some examples if I can. Surely will help a lot of people.

Thanks again for commenting!

]]> By: Hackadelic http://www.revolves.net/2009/02/19/the-fundamental-law-of-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-706 Hackadelic Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:53:56 +0000 http://www.revolves.net/?p=59#comment-706 THANKS! It's so good to meet someone with the "right" attitude about SEO. (<a href="http://hackadelic.com/welcome-to-the-machine-or-8-easy-steps-to-nowhere" rel="nofollow">I ranted about SEO-insanity</a>, but I had the impression I'm pretty much alone on this.) I remember once I came across an excellent example of a <em>real SEO guru</em>, who accentuated the difference between <em>dumb SEO</em> (that is, keyword stuffing), and the fine art of SEO (that is, smoothly integrating SEO-effective notions that do not obscure, but refine the content). I just can't remember where it was. You don't happen to have such examples? THANKS! It’s so good to meet someone with the “right” attitude about SEO. (I ranted about SEO-insanity, but I had the impression I’m pretty much alone on this.)

I remember once I came across an excellent example of a real SEO guru, who accentuated the difference between dumb SEO (that is, keyword stuffing), and the fine art of SEO (that is, smoothly integrating SEO-effective notions that do not obscure, but refine the content). I just can’t remember where it was.

You don’t happen to have such examples?

]]>